First off I'm having a hard time understanding why the church is getting involved at all in a political issue. Does the whole separation of church and state not apply for some reason here? Some might say "well this is a moral issue so we need to get involved". If that's true then why didn't we get involved when we jumped head first in to this war? I find that war often leads to death and destruction of whole cities. I'm pretty sure that ought to be considered a moral issue! Why was there not a peep out of church leaders about that?
Why is our church raising and spending $21 million on the fight against gay marriage? 2 1 M I L L I O N D O L L A R S?!!! How many starving children could we have fed with that money? How many lives could we have saved in Darfur? How many homeless people could we have reached out to? And all because we are afraid. This is a civil rights issue. And last time I checked out church history we didn't have the best reputation for upholding civil rights. The LDS church took a stand against the civil rights of women, and black people. Of course your not gonna get that info at church, but check out some church history and it's all there. And as far as I could tell it all worked out all right. I mean, I can own property and vote, so thats good... right? Could it be that we are in the same situation now?
I recently read a book called SWAY. It talks about why people do irrational things. It says that two major reasons why people make irrational choices is because of #1 Fear of loss and #2 Commitment. I was thinking about how that applies to this prop 8 situation. The rationale I am hearing from people in the church is that they are afraid of losing their own rights if gay people are allowed to get married. That is what the average white man was afraid of in the 19th century with blacks gaining their own civil rights. I also see how the church has sent out the calvary on this issue and all these people are doing it out of a strong commitment to their faith. Key word there is commitment. Case in point, 70% of the funds raised in the christian coalition are from the LDS church members. So what I am asking you all now is, does all of this seem rational to you?
God asked us to use our faculties and choose for ourselves. Yes the LDS church has a prophet and for some it is enough to follow him without taking the time to pray for ourselves. But I don't think that is what his purpose here is. You don't have to read much of the scriptures, ancient or modern, to see that prophets are quite capable of making bad choices here and there, just like the rest of us. (I'm tempted to put a slanderous racial quote in here from Brigham Young, but I'll spare you.) So this is my conundrum. I am seriously disappointed in how members are handling this situation. But, who knows. Maybe i'm just the voice of corruption, the spawn of the devil. Or that poor Megan who fell by the wayside. Judge if you must, but as my good friend Amanda says, "I choose to ere on the side of compassion."



2 comments:
Yeah, I am totally with you on this one. I got into this very discussion with active LDS coworkers last night, and it just boggles my mind the anger (and like you said fear) associated with this issue. I especially don't like how it seems so easy to see the mote in others' eyes and ignore the beams in my own. . .my little sins will keep me out just as much as their 'unnatural' big sins. We ALL need the Atonement. Like you inferred, it used to be considered unnatural, and it was in fact illegal for a black man/woman to marry a white woman/man. Why aren't we more concerned about the evil that persists in the world - Darfur, children sex trade, etc etc.
Oh, I am cracking up at Robert Kirby's article on Prop 8: http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_10798657
So freaking funny, and I believe right on. For LDS members worried about the Feds "forcing" the church to marry gay people in the Temple, it will never happen. That is a fundamental principal of separation of church and state. The church will always have the right to determine who can and can't get married in the temple. I suppose the Feds might revoke our tax-exempt status, but we're a rich church, so that shouldn't be a problem. Crazy stuff.
Post a Comment